There are various antievolutionary claims made by intelligent design proponents that are not discussed in Of Pandas and People nor addressed in Kitzmiller v. Dover. Each of these can be scientifically evaluated and debunked.
Read the following brief summary of antievolution claims.
On common descent: The sudden appearance of major new forms of life in the fossil record, and the stability of these forms over long periods of time, supports multiple origins rather than a single common ancestor.
On anatomical homology: Variation in the genetic and developmental control of homologous structures and the control of different structures by the same genes is evidence against anatomical homology and common ancestry.
On molecular homology: Different genes, methods, and even laboratories can generate phylogenies that show variable and often inconsistent evolutionary relationships among organisms.
On natural selection: Experiments on natural selection do not produce new species.
On natural selection and mutation: Mutation-induced changes have fitness costs and cannot be used by evolution.
Now further explore some of the evidence for evolution, particularly as it relates to the claims above.
