Designing the Citigroup Skyscraper

Resource for Grades 3-8

WGBH: Building Big
Designing the Citigroup Skyscraper

Media Type:
Video

Running Time: 4m 26s
Size: 13.2 MB


Source: Building Big: "Thinking Big, Building Small"

This resource was adapted from Building Big: "Thinking Big, Building Small."

Resource Produced by:

WGBH Educational Foundation

Collection Developed by:

WGBH Educational Foundation

Collection Credits

Collection Funded by:

National Science Foundation

In this video segment, adapted from Thinking Big, Building Small, narrator David Macaulay and structural engineer William LeMessurier explain the set of problems LeMessurier faced when designing the Citigroup Center over a church, and the engineering solutions that led to this marvelous addition to the New York City skyline.

open Background Essay

Rarely do architects and structural engineers face a problem as unusual and difficult to solve as that presented by the Citigroup Center (formerly called Citicorp Center and Citibank Center) in New York City. Like all large structures, this skyscraper, completed in 1977, is subject to forces, including wind, vibrations from city traffic, the weight and movements of occupants and equipment inside, and the force of its own weight. Unlike most buildings, however, the 914-foot-tall (279-meter-tall) Citigroup Center has no support directly under each of its four corners.

In the early 1970s, developers acquired almost an entire city block for the site of the proposed skyscraper. That's almost, because one corner of this particular block was already occupied by a church, which stood exactly where architects wanted one of the skyscraper's corners to be. The church allowed the developers to use the space above it, on the condition that a new church be built in the same spot as the old one.

In order to use the space above the church, structural engineers designed the Citigroup building so that it would stand on four stiltlike columns, one in the middle of each of its sides. Normally such a design would result in a structure far less stable than a building supported on all four corners or supported all the way around its base.

To account for the unusual placement of the building's support columns, engineers of the Citigroup Center designed an internal steel skeleton that would support the corners indirectly. In this frame, steel beams are arranged like giant Vs, with the tops of each V attached to opposite corners and the bottom attached to a column running vertically up and down the center of each side. These angled beams transfer the weight from the corners of the building to the strong vertical columns, much like a shelf bracket transfers the weight of the shelf and its contents to the wall to which it is mounted. The result of this design is a building that seems to defy gravity.

open Discussion Questions

  • When you put columns at the corners, you have to support the centers of the sides. When you put columns at the centers of the sides, you have to support the corners. Why are these two problems so different?
  • Where else do you have to use triangles because the load is neither near nor between the columns (e.g., shelf brackets)?
  • Why might it have been important to build over the church and not just tear it down? What might have been the societal impact of tearing it down?
  • Why are triangles so rigid? Make some triangles and quadrilaterals out of cardboard and fasteners, and experiment with trying to change their shapes. What does what you have learned in geometry about triangles have to do with how they are used in structures?
  • Look around at buildings in your neighborhood. Can you find places where triangles are used to make the building more stable?

  • open Transcript

    SUSAN KNACK, Civil Engineer: Designing a building is sort of like any sort of problem solving. You first need to identify what the problem is you have to solve.

    DAVID PREVATT, Civil Engineer: The building is like the end of a process— it isn't the beginning, it isn't the start.

    KNACK: Is it going to be a school? Are you going to build a skyscraper? Are you going to build a stadium?

    NARRATOR: Or a bank? In the early 1970s, Citibank wanted new headquarters. Their architect presented structural engineer William LeMessurier with an unusual challenge: Citibank's new skyscraper had to stand over a church.

    WILLIAM LEMESSURIER, Civil Engineer: Well, normally you would bring columns down in the four corners as well as along the way. But this wasn't possible— the church was there. So a radical solution had to be, uh, found.

    NARRATOR: William LeMessurier had to design a solution for a very tough problem. He and his team needed to find a way for the skyscraper to stand above the church.

    LEMESSURIER: We closed in after months of work on the idea that there would be columns in the middle of each side and not at the corners.

    KNACK: Typically a structure has columns at the four outside corners, if you just had a simple square. The challenge is if you move the columns to the center you have to carry the load to the center points.

    NARRATOR: Imagine you took the legs of a table and moved them from the corners to the center of each side. To keep the skyscraper from toppling over. LeMessurier made use of triangles. He planned for steel beams to be arranged like giant Vs to direct the building's weight away from its corners and toward the four columns in the center of the sides. The engineer realized that his triangles had an additional benefit.

    LEMESSURIER: This turns out to be the most efficient way to resist wind forces on the building.

    PREVATT: A tall building, any building... all buildings move. Some move more than others.

    GIRL: I didn't know that. It's cool... It's cool, but it's kind of scary, too.

    BOY: I would probably think that the building wasn't built correctly.

    KNACK: As a structural engineer, you have to account for various forces. As we talked about before, you have to account for weight. You also have to account for natural forces such as wind. I'm sure everybody has experienced a wind force.

    GIRL: It's kind of like being underwater with a lot of water pushing you, except the water is not there.

    BOY: Blowing, like struggling to move forward.

    KNACK: Well, a building gets blown just like you do during a windstorm. And so, when your umbrella flips outside its structure couldn't support the wind load. And a building has that same sort of force against it.

    PREVATT: Every time you walk on the street corner and the wind blows against you, do you fall down? No, you don't, because you're actually resisting the wind somehow. How do you do that? Is it muscle? Is it balance?

    So, therefore, if I can design in my building muscle and balance I will allow that building to move just a little bit but it'll stay in its place and it'll be safe.

    NARRATOR: For Citibank, LeMessurier used triangles in his design to help give his skyscraper the "muscles" and "balance" it needed to resist the wind.

    PREVATT: If you look around at long bridges or some buildings you're going to see a lot of triangles. And why is that?

    (wind blowing)

    NARRATOR: The square structure moves in the wind. (creaking) And bends... (creaking) when weight is applied. Crossbeams form triangles and add stiffness. (wind blowing)

    PREVATT: The triangle is a very stable shape, and civil engineers, structural engineers, we use it repeatedly.

    NARRATOR: Millions of people live and work in Manhattan. How do you think the triangle helped building designers make this possible?


    open Standards

     
    to:

    Loading Content Loading Standards

    National Science Digital Library Teachers' Domain is proud to be a Pathways portal to the National Science Digital Library.
    PBS LearningMedia
    Teachers' Domain is moving to PBS LearningMedia on October 15, 2013. On that date you will be automatically redirected to PBS LearningMedia when visiting Teachers' Domain.
    Close PBS LearningMedia PBS LearningMedia Login