Chernobyl: What Really Happened?

Resource for Grades 6-12

WGBH: Frontline
Chernobyl: What Really Happened?

Media Type:
Document

Size: 85.1 KB


Source: FRONTLINE: "Nuclear Reaction"


Resource Produced by:

WGBH Educational Foundation

Collection Developed by:

WGBH Educational Foundation

Collection Credits

Collection Funded by:

National Science Foundation

Nuclear energy has not always been viewed with the caution that this useful but potentially disastrous power source deserves. In the early 1980s, especially in the U.S.S.R., citizens were led to believe that nuclear power offered the ultimate in safety, cleanliness, and reliability. As this text excerpted from Richard Rhodes' book, Nuclear Renewal and reprinted on the FRONTLINE Web site explains, such beliefs led to the complacency responsible for the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear power plant disaster, the worst accident of its kind in history.

open Background Essay

Most industrial accidents result from either a design flaw in the equipment or human error. The nuclear power plant disaster in Chernobyl, USSR (now Ukraine) in 1986 -- the worst of its kind in history -- has both to blame. By most accounts, the Soviet-built reactor, one of four at the Chernobyl plant, had inherent problems. The nuclear reaction it facilitated was hard to control and prone to unpredictable power surges, especially when the reactor was running at very low power outputs, such as during maintenance or testing.

The Chernobyl disaster began during a test of whether the reactor's emergency equipment and cooling system would function in the event of power loss to the station. However, insufficient safety precautions were taken. Experts argue that reactor operators should have been on high alert given the unpredictable nature of this type of reactor at low outputs. Instead, due to complacency and miscommunication, the reactor fell to an output so low that a power surge was practically inevitable. At the same time, plant operators removed increasing numbers of control rods, used to slow or stop nuclear fission in a reactor, virtually assuring a runaway reaction if a power surge occurred.

Poor decisions combined with a reduced flow of coolant water to the reactor (due, in part, to the test) and the disconnection of the emergency core-cooling system resulted in a power surge estimated at 100 times normal output. Graphite surrounding the fuel rods and at the tips of the control rods, which facilitated fission reactions during normal operation, speeded the out-of-control reaction to the point of catastrophe. The ensuing explosions destroyed the reactor core, blew off the roof, and, because there was no containment structure, spread radioactive debris across hundreds of kilometers. More than a hundred thousand people were evacuated. According to estimates, in the ensuing months several thousand people died from complications due to radiation exposure. More than 15 years later, survivors of the Chernobyl disaster continue to report poor physical and psychological health and higher than average rates of cancer.

open Discussion Questions

  • What were some problems with the design of the Chernobyl reactor?
  • What other factors contributed to the accident at Chernobyl?
  • Could a reactor in the United States have similar problems with a similar outcome? Why or why not?
  • Do you think there should be international standards for nuclear reactors? Why or why not?
  • What can engineers do to minimize risks associated with nuclear power plants?

  • open Standards

     
    to:

    Loading Content Loading Standards

    National Science Digital Library Teachers' Domain is proud to be a Pathways portal to the National Science Digital Library.
    PBS LearningMedia
    Teachers' Domain is moving to PBS LearningMedia on October 15, 2013. On that date you will be automatically redirected to PBS LearningMedia when visiting Teachers' Domain.
    Close PBS LearningMedia PBS LearningMedia Login