FAQs About Nuclear Power

Resource for Grades 6-12

WGBH: Frontline
FAQs About Nuclear Power

Media Type:
Document

Size: 93.0 KB


Source: FRONTLINE: "Nuclear Reaction"


Resource Produced by:

WGBH Educational Foundation

Collection Developed by:

WGBH Educational Foundation

Collection Credits

Collection Funded by:

National Science Foundation

In this interview transcript published on the FRONTLINE Web site, Dr. Charles Till, a nuclear physicist and Associate Lab Director at Argonne National Laboratory West in Idaho, addresses a number of issues surrounding nuclear power, including its great energy potential and whether public fears over its dangers are valid. Dr. Till presents one side of a larger debate.

open Background Essay

We utilize a variety of processes involving reactions of different elements and materials to provide us with the energy we use in our everyday lives. The process most familiar to us, combustion, involves chemical reactions. During combustion, molecules in matter rapidly combine with oxygen, and the atoms in the molecules are rearranged. During such chemical reactions, energy is released. We then use this energy for heating, cooking, or electrical generation. In controlled nuclear reactions, by contrast, the elements that serve as fuel -- uranium and plutonium in fission reactions, and two forms of hydrogen in fusion reactions -- are transformed at the atomic nuclear level into different elements with lower energy. Again, usable energy is released, but in these reactions the energy yield is significantly higher than in chemical reactions.

Nuclear physicist Dr. Charles Till, a strong proponent of the further development of nuclear technologies, argues that nuclear power is not only safe, but is also cleaner than fossil fuels, which produce greenhouse gases and other pollutants. Nuclear energy production yields a small volume of waste relative to that produced by burning fossil fuels. However, fears about the dangers of this waste -- in particular, the long period over which harmful decay products are emitted -- pervade public opinion. Dr. Till blames myths that have arisen in the public mind since the events at Chernobyl and Three Mile Island. He argues that although Chernobyl was the worst accident possible for a nuclear plant, modern reactors are engineered specifically to ensure against such potentially destructive releases into the environment.

Despite nuclear energy's demonstrated potential, nuclear detractors point to such things as the elevated incidence of leukemia in communities near reprocessing plants in Europe and nuclear energy's cost inefficiencies, and they question whether such risks to human health and the environment are worth the price of further development. They argue that we should invest instead in other "clean" power-producing technologies that use renewable resources.

open Discussion Questions

  • What are some characteristics of uranium that make it a good fuel for nuclear reactors?
  • What are some similarities and differences between uranium and plutonium?
  • What are the pros and cons of recycling plutonium to use in nuclear reactors?
  • What did you learn about radiation that was new information for you?
  • What information in this interview do you think is particularly interesting? Explain why.
  • How do you think nuclear power compares to other industries?

  • open Standards

     
    to:

    Loading Content Loading Standards

    National Science Digital Library Teachers' Domain is proud to be a Pathways portal to the National Science Digital Library.
    PBS LearningMedia
    Teachers' Domain is moving to PBS LearningMedia on October 15, 2013. On that date you will be automatically redirected to PBS LearningMedia when visiting Teachers' Domain.
    Close PBS LearningMedia PBS LearningMedia Login