Einstein's Cosmic Speed Limit

Resource for Grades 9-12

Einstein's Cosmic Speed Limit

Media Type:
Video

Running Time: 3m 31s
Size: 20.5 MB

or


This media asset was adapted from "Einstein's Cosmic Speed Limit"/NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center.

Resource Produced by:

WNET

Collection Developed by:

WGBH Educational Foundation WNET

Collection Credits

Collection Funded by:

NASA

This video focuses on one particularly interesting result from NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Telescope sky survey. In May of 2009, the highly sensitive telescope received two photons 900 milliseconds apart after a journey of 7 billion years – meaning the photons traveled 7 billion light years and arrived at virtually the same moment. That result, described and animated in the video, offers support for one of Einstein’s predictions - that space-time is smooth – thus discounting several competing theories that posit a “foamy” space-time structure that would have caused the two photons to arrive with a greater time separation.

open Background Essay

NASA’s Fermi gamma-ray telescope detects gamma rays, the highest-energy radiation on the electromagnetic (EM) spectrum. By way of comparison, gamma rays have about a billion times more energy than the visible light we can see with our eyes. A recent event, captured by Fermi, helped NASA scientists affirms one of the fundamental concepts in Einstein’s vision of the universe: that its space-time structure is fundamentally flat and uniform. Two high-energy photons traveled 7 billion light years and arrived at essentially the same time. This simple fact helped scientists distinguish between several competing theories about the structure of space-time.

The two photons began their journey 7 billion light years away. A light year is the distance light travels in one year, about 6 trillion miles. So, 7 billion light years is about 42 billion trillion miles: (or 4.2 x 1022 miles) – about halfway across the entire universe. Had they arrived at the Fermi detector at different times, then that time gap would have indicated a non-uniformity in space-time, a “frothiness” rather than a “smoothness” in the fundamental fabric of the universe. Since they arrived at the same time, the results eliminated several theories that proposed that space-time wasn’t fundamentally flat and uniform, thus supporting Einstein’s prediction that it is. The result doesn’t prove that Einstein was right, but it is consistent with his theories and not consistent with competing theories.

One of the current challenges in modern physics is to find a way to link two opposite domains: the very large and the very small. General Relativity, which describes gravitational effects in terms of a space-time continuum that is affected by and affects masses, has proven itself as a strong model for large-scale phenomena. At the other extreme, quantum theory, which describes the nature and behavior of the very tiny world of atoms and subatomic particles, has proven equally effective and predictive for very small-scale phenomena. Scientists continue to struggle, though to bridge these two worlds.

The probabilistic nature of quantum reality doesn’t translate to the cosmic scale, and, conversely, the models and theories that so accurately describe and predict large-scale phenomena break down when applied to the tiny quantum universe. The search for a theory of “quantum gravity” continues. This video captures a true edge of science, a threshold between knowing and not-knowing that epitomizes the scientific process.


open Discussion Questions

Before Viewing

  • What is space-time?
  • What is a photon and how do photons relate to the EM spectrum? Do you think a photon’s energy might determine how quickly it could travel through space? How could you find out if that’s true?
  • Why do you think the speed of light seems to be so important in physics?
  • While Viewing

  • The photons actually arrive 900 milliseconds apart. Why do the NASA scientists seem not to care too much about that gap? Listen for the analogy used by one of the scientists in the video.
  • Based on what you saw in the video, if you were testing to see how textured or “frothy” space-time is, why would you want to include both low-energy and high-energy photons in your observations? How would textured space-time possibly affect low and high-energy photons differently?
  • How did scientists use the travel time of photons to try to understand something about the nature of the space those photos were traveling through? What would the implications have been if the two photos had had markedly different travel times?
  • After Viewing

  • In your own words, describe why the photon-pair that Fermi observed was so significant that NASA made this video.
  • When you think about the “shape” and structure of space-time, what do you visualize? Did the bubble wrap analogy in the video help? Was it confusing? Can you think of other visualizations that would have helped?
  • What do you think would have happened if the two photons had traveled even farther before reaching the Fermi detector? Would the time gap have been larger? Smaller? Would it have mattered?
  • Bonus Question: Why do you think the large-scale world of General Relativity and the small-scale world of quantum theory don’t mesh so easily? Do you have ideas for how they are connected?

open Transcript

Einstein's Cosmic Speed Limit

Chris Smith: Light, we all know it travels at well, the speed of light, or does it? When it comes to the structure of space and time, could light be the key to unlocking the final secrets of the universe? Answers may lie in the journey of two photons across seven billion light years of space, recorded by the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope. And these two tiny particles have just opened up a whole new chapter in our understanding of light, gravity, and the universe around us.

Julie McEnery:We're really excited because we've captured rare experimental evidence probing the fundamental structure of space and time.

Host: Meet NASA's gamma-ray detectives. Led by project scientist Julie McEnery, they're searching for clues about the high-energy mysteries of our universe. But, they'll need more than a magnifying glass this. The team's one of kind tool? The Fermi satellite. Fermi looks at gamma-rays, the highest-energy form of light and it just surprised everyone with a discovery about the fabric of space and time.

Julie McEnery: So you might be thinking, two tiny particles of light, why is that important? Well you have to look at the very large and the very small together to understand the universe as a whole. So far, Einstein's Theory of Relativity, which describes space and time as a smooth fabric that's distorted, or bent by massive objects, has been a spectacularly successful explanation of gravity and the large scale behavior of the universe. Whereas Quantum Mechanics, another spectacularly successful model describes the workings of atoms subatomic particles and some of the fundamental forces of nature. Scientists have never been able to reconcile the two. Both Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are equally fundamental in their own regimes. So scientists want to find a theory of everything that describes the universe as a whole. And the observations that we've made these two photons with Fermi takes us one step closer to achieving the goal of having a Theory of Everything that combines the most successful aspects of Quantum Mechanics and Relativity into one unified theory.

Host:To add to this puzzle, other telescopes have observed gamma rays with different wavelengths arriving at Earth at different times. According to Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity, all forms of electromagnetic radiation from radio and infrared, to visible light, to X-rays and even gamma-rays moves at the same speed. So what would explain these differences in arrival times? One simple idea is that maybe the photons were just emitted at different times. More interestingly though, maybe there was something in the very fabric of space that was causing the higher-energy particle to slow down. If this is true, could Einstein have been wrong? Could a higher-energy particle move slower than the speed of light? [Music] Several ideas, which attempt to reconcile relativity and quantum mechanics suggest that space and time are not actually smooth and uniform. But are instead a seething froth when seen at the smallest scale. Like bubble wrap viewed from far away, at human scales this texture would be invisible. A low -energy, long wavelength photon is unaffected by the lumpiness of space. But a high-energy, short wavelength photon is hindered by the froth. This makes it move more slowly than lower-energy radiation, so it breaks Einstein's law that all light particles must travel at the same speed. However, this explanation had little experimental proof either way--until Fermi arrived.

Julie: We observed a gamma-ray burst. A gamma-ray bust is a huge explosion. That gamma-ray burst produced a large number of photons, one of which had enormous energy, and very short wavelengths. Those photons traveled seven billion year to reach us, and yet the highest energy, the shortest wavelength of photon arrived within 900 milliseconds of the lower-energy photons. That's a little bit like racing two speed-boats, one through water and the other through molasses, and having them arrive at the same time; it just doesn't happen. Because Fermi saw no delay in the arrival time of the two photons, it confirms that space and time is smooth and continuous as Einstein had predicted. And it shuts the door on several theories of everything that had predicted that space and time might be foamy enough to interfere with light.

Host: So, if space-time really isn't just invisible bubble wrap, what is it? Fermi's eliminated some ideas from the mix, and that means we're one step closer to potentially unifying Relativity and Quantum Mechanics. After all, science is a process of elimination, and unless we keep eliminating, we may never know if this Theory of Everything actually exists, hidden in the math of our universe. But for now, we'll have to keep searching for clues beyond our small planet, because the answers truly lie among the stars.


open Standards

 
to:

Loading Content Loading Standards

PBS LearningMedia
Teachers' Domain is moving to PBS LearningMedia on October 15, 2013. On that date you will be automatically redirected to PBS LearningMedia when visiting Teachers' Domain.
Close PBS LearningMedia PBS LearningMedia Login