Implementing Brown

Resource for Grades 6-12

WGBH: American Experience
Implementing Brown

Media Type:
Video

Running Time: 6m 32s
Size: 9.2 MB


Source: American Experience: "Eisenhower"


Resource Produced by:

WGBH Educational Foundation

Collection Developed by:

WGBH Educational Foundation Birmingham Civil Rights Institute Washington University in St. Louis

Collection Credits

Collection Funded by:

Institute of Museum and Library Services

This video segment reveals conflicting views of President Eisenhower's response to the Brown v. Board of Education ruling against segregated schools. NAACP attorney Constance Baker Motley argues that the president should have done more to enforce the ruling. Former attorney general Herbert Brownell and his deputy, William Rogers, explain the president's cautious response.

open Background Essay

In 1954, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. Board of Education that segregated schools were unconstitutional. However, the Court did not specify how the ruling would be implemented. This was the first time the federal government had intervened in public schools, an area traditionally overseen by state governments. While the Supreme Court had the power to interpret the law and declare segregation unconstitutional, the power to enforce the decision fell to state and local authorities.

In 1955, in what became known as Brown II, the Supreme Court ruled that schools must act "with all deliberate speed." However, the ruling did not specify a timeframe. NAACP attorneys Constance Baker Motley and Thurgood Marshall saw the Court's ruling as ambiguous, and a setback. Many southern states refused to comply with the Brown ruling, sparking tension between federal and state governments and creating an impasse for school desegregation.

Civil rights advocates wanted immediate integration, but segregationists were determined to prevent it. In 1956, 100 southern congressmen signed the Southern Manifesto, accusing the federal government of abusing judicial power and infringing on states' rights; they pledged not only to resist the ruling, but to reverse it.

Perceived as a hero during his first term for his decisive action in World War II, President Dwight D. Eisenhower would suffer criticism in his second term for his reluctance to enforce the Brown ruling.

Eisenhower was considered a "gradualist" -- he respected the Court's authority, but believed the South needed time to get used to the idea of integrated schools. Eisenhower was reluctant to get involved, but the Supreme Court's ruling sparked tremendous controversy and violence, and people on both sides of the issue looked to the president for leadership.

In 1957, two years after Brown II, an attempt to integrate schools in Little Rock, Arkansas, turned volatile. The president was forced to get involved. When Arkansas governor Orval Faubus wouldn't guarantee the safety of nine black students, President Eisenhower enforced Brown by sending 350 federal troops to maintain order in Little Rock and escort the students into school. The troops stayed until the end of the school year.

The following year, rather than comply with the Court's ruling, Faubus and the Little Rock school board closed the schools.

open Discussion Questions

  • What is the meaning of Judge Motley's statement: "...this was a major social issue in the country. It wasn't just a legal issue..."?
  • What do you think a president should do when faced with a social issue affecting the nation? Are there similar issues today?
  • Do you agree with the way Eisenhower used his position to implement the Brown decision? Why or why not?

  • open Standards

     
    to:

    Loading Content Loading Standards

    PBS LearningMedia
    Teachers' Domain is moving to PBS LearningMedia on October 15, 2013. On that date you will be automatically redirected to PBS LearningMedia when visiting Teachers' Domain.
    Close PBS LearningMedia PBS LearningMedia Login