Astronomers have attempted to develop a uniform standard of classification for the variety of astronomical objects that have been, and continue to be, discovered. The International Astronomical Union (IAU), founded in 1919 and composed of professional astronomers from around the world, serves as the authority for naming celestial bodies and the surface features found on them.

One of the most hotly debated issues for the IAU to resolve was the scientific definition of a planet. For centuries, the common understanding was that a planet was a large object orbiting a star. However, with the continual advancement of technology and astronomy, new objects were being discovered that called upon the need for an official definition. This debate was fully ignited in 2005 with the discovery of a new object in our solar system larger than Pluto. Originally known as 2003 UB313, this object was eventually named Eris in 2006.

In August 2006, members of the IAU passed a resolution that defined a planet as a celestial body that

1. is in orbit around the Sun;

2. has sufficient mass for its self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape (i.e., it assumes a nearly round shape due to its own gravity); and

3. has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit (i.e., it is the dominant mass in its orbit).

According to this definition, our solar system has eight planets: Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune. The IAU determined that Pluto has not cleared its neighborhood because it orbits among the objects of the Kuiper Belt. As such, Pluto is no longer classified as a planet, but rather as a dwarf planet. Eris has also been designated as a dwarf planet. It is expected that the list of dwarf planets will increase while the number of planets will remain at eight.

Significant controversy surrounds this definition of a planet. For the general public, it was difficult to unlearn what they had been taught about the number of planets in the solar system and to lose Pluto, often a sentimental favorite. However, in addition to the media frenzy over the demotion of Pluto, there was also protest within the scientific community.

Among astronomers, the objection was not over the loss of Pluto as a planet but over the wording of the definition, which is ambiguous. For example, what defines a "cleared neighborhood," and how round is "nearly round"? In addition, the definition applies only to our solar system, so there is no universal definition for a planet. Within one week of the resolution's passage, more than 300 scientists signed a petition stating that they did not agree with the IAU's definition of a planet and that a better definition was needed. As of 2006, the debate is not over. The definition put in place by the members of the IAU who voted (only about 5 percent of the world's astronomers) may yet be redefined.

Find viewing ideas on NOVA Teachers for this video segment.

Print Background Essay