Despite the Emancipation Proclamation, the defeat of the Confederacy, and the 13th Amendment to the Constitution permanently abolishing slavery, the United States in 1865 was still deeply divided over what to do with its newly freed black population. The Federal government had created a “Freedman’s Bureau” even before the war’s end to help provide former slaves with food, medical care, housing, and education. In angry response, local white authorities had passed a series of “Black Codes” restricting the right of former slaves to own property, controlling where they were allowed to live, and forcing them to work as either agricultural laborers or domestic servants—often in unfair “sharecropping” arrangements hardly distinguishable from slavery itself.
Further complicating matters was the division even within the victorious North about how the South should be governed and eventually reassimilated into the Union. Reflecting a widespread unease about former slaves gaining political power, Democratic President Andrew Johnson broke with his Republican predecessor Abraham Lincoln by supporting all-white rule over local southern governments. He was opposed by the so-called “Radical” Republicans who insisted on full voting rights for black men. Moderate Republicans preferred more limited civil rights for the former slaves, but eventually they joined with the Radicals to override Johnson’s veto and pass the 1866 Civil Rights Act.
This piece of landmark legislation abolished most of the Black Codes and gave former slaves the rights and privileges of citizenship. This status was further guaranteed by the 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution—ratification of which by formerly rebel states was made a condition of their readmission to the Union. With the passage of these “Reconstruction Amendments,” former slaves throughout the South enjoyed a brief period in which they could own land anywhere, seek employment of their choosing, and use the same public accommodations as whites. Most importantly, they were allowed to vote and run for public office, which they did successfully across the South.
White southerners, however, refused to submit to what they called “Negro Rule.” Groups like the Ku Klux Klan terrorized southern Republican governments, black voters, and black political leaders through acts of violence that included murder and torture. In 1871, Congress authorized Republican President Ulysses S. Grant to use Federal troops to put down the growing insurgency of southern white militias.
In the meantime, exaggerated reports of corruption among southern black Republican politicians eroded Northern enthusiasm for Reconstruction policies. When the financial crash of 1873 distracted the North’s attention and further sapped its resolve, southern whites renewed violence and intimidation against black voters to regain political power. Two years later, anti-Reconstruction Democrats took control of the U.S. House of Representatives. By 1877, Federal troops would be withdrawn from the South and white-controlled governments across the South began repealing the polices of Reconstruction.
The era of Jim Crow segregation had begun.
Gates: If there is anyone who was deeply and personally affected by Lincoln’s capacity for growth it was Frederick Douglass. In Douglass’s eyes Lincoln was transformed from slave catcher to true friend.
Horton: Lincoln changes dramatically from the time of the Civil War to the time of his assassination. And Douglass witnesses that change. That change impresses Douglass. Lincoln showed that capacity for personal growth and as he learned more, he put his new knowledge into action. It changed his assumptions. He started to think about slavery, about the nation and even about race in a different way. We don’t know how far the change would have gone.
Gates: This to me is perhaps the greatest tragedy of Lincoln’s death. After a brief period of Reconstruction, the forward movement of black people abruptly stopped, and for decades we were stuck in a kind of limbo, neither slaves nor fully citizens. It’s impossible to know how different this country might have been had Abraham Lincoln lived. Would African-Americans have suffered the abuses of Jim Crow segregation? Would we have needed Dr. King to give his greatest speech - and would he have done so here?
Blight: Lincoln sits at the center of the broadest American story that we want to believe we’re living. The narrative of redemption, improvement progress.
Faust: So much of what we see ourselves to be depended on what he did. Shenk: Lincoln laid the foundations for the modern American state.
Clinton: He won the war, held the country together and forced it toward genuine equality. And he paid the ultimate price for what he believed in.
Obama: “Two centuries later a government of the people, by the people and for the people has not perished from the earth, this is your victory! “
Gates: Now 150 YEARS after his death perhaps we all have finally witnessed Lincoln’s enduring legacy; the living realization of his vision of America.
Obama: As Lincoln said to a nation far more divided than ours we are not enemies but friends, though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection, I need your help and I will be your president, too!